Just when I need a reference, I leave the book at home ...
Hahnel and Albert's *Quiet Revolution in Welfare Economics* has a short discussion of Marx's LTV, with, if I remember correctly, notes to sources of further discussion.
>For the most part, you cannot refute any economic theory unless is is
>logically inconsistent. ...
That's what Krugman and the neoclassicals would like us to believe, isn't it? You certainly can refute a theory by showing it is not consistent with empirical evidence, can you not?
Bill