>For those of us who know better, this book is like a New York Times
>crossword puzzle. Immensely entertaining and testing but substantially
>deviod of meaning. Henwood has half-learned most everything he writes
>about here. Unfortunately many laymen won't be able to distinguish the
>few piercing insights in this
>book from the river of drivel from which they must be plucked. A little
>knowledge is a dangerous thing, indeed.
I love it when people say you're all wrong and don't specify how. But from the first, I aspired to be deviod. And piercing, too. What more can I ask for?
Doug