London Times calls for 'Outright default on Tsarist lines...'

Mark Jones Jones_M at netcomuk.co.uk
Tue Aug 18 02:25:45 PDT 1998


[The Times also today commended 'President

Yeltsin's promotion of the tough and

experienced Boris Fyodorov as Deputy Prime

Minister'. When Boris Fyodorov, who actually is an obese crook, was head of the Russian Dept in the London HQ of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development in 1990, he tried to sell me a Russian cornflake factory. When I told him I had no money for such a purchase, he offered me a soft-drink bottling plant instead...

Mark Jones]

'Thank God the leak isn't at

our end of the boat'

Anthony Harris

The sound of thunder all round the horizon.

Russia devalues and suspends foreign debt

payments. China declares against devaluation, but

the Hong Kong authorities are driven into direct

intervention in the markets. In Japan, now in an

officially confessed slump, the Nikkei lurches

below the 15,000 level.

Countries from the Far East, through Texas to

southern Europe face the ravages of El Niño; yet

commodity prices still fall. The Bank of England

and the US Federal Reserve warn of inflationary

pressures at home. And the London equity

market? It wobbles a bit, while gilts achieve new

highs.

Calm nerves, or just heads in the sand? It is true

the troubles are still a long way away

geographically and that widespread recession

outside helps to restrain prices in more fortunate

countries. But if, as we are constantly told, this is

a global economy served by a global financial

market, can troubles really remain localised?

Perhaps the most apt comment was made

prophetically an age ago by the late cartoonist

David Low. His picture showed a lifeboat, sinking

by the stern. At the wet end, peasants of many

nations, bailing desperately. At the dry end, a

group of silk-hatted financiers: "Thank God the

leak isn't at our end of the boat."

The world slump followed shortly afterwards. All

right, we have learnt a great deal about managing

emergencies in the past 70 years, so maybe

another 1929 really is unlikely. But no worries,

after all? Perhaps a more helpful analogy was

provided (not much later) by my small sister. She

was complaining pitifully about an earache.

"You're not ill, darling; it's just your ear," she was

told. "I know, but I'm fixed on to it," came the

reply. The little girl was right: earache deserves to

be taken seriously. The right reaction is neither

complacency nor panic, but careful diagnosis.

Russia first. Is this a real crisis or just a financial

squall? If you look only at the numbers it does not

look too bad. The country was until this year in

comfortable current account surplus, thanks to oil,

and its financial crisis is largely oil-price related - a

side-effect of collapsing Asian demand. This has

hit both the foreign balance and the Government's

tax revenues.

Devaluation, which will sharply raise the rouble

prices of oil, is the logical answer at least to the

revenue problem, provided that oil taxes can be

collected, which is at least not impossible any

more.

So George Soros was right all along? It is not quite

as simple as that. The foreign balance will not

respond in the short term; dollar oil revenues are

still down. But this again is a problem we have

learnt to handle. Indeed, the IMF has a special

facility for commodity related finance; only its

officials can explain why Russia was not given an

oil bail-out rather than the banker's rescue which

is, in fact, on offer. Perhaps the officials can even

now have second thoughts. It might restore their

market credibility.

Failing this, the Russian moratorium on foreign

debt service is a sensible first step. Indeed, an

indefinite moratorium, or even an outright default

on tsarist lines, would be easy to defend. Russia's

internal stability is far more important, not only to

President Yeltsin, but to the rest of the world, than

whether a few banks take a hit. As prewar

experience showed, even a defaulting country can

become creditworthy again surprisingly soon if it

achieves domestic stability. But internal stability is

now the big problem.

It is a pity that President Yeltsin told his obligatory

lies about devaluation in quite such ringing terms:

the immediate reaction is that Russian citizens are

unloading roubles. Will Mr Soros have to mount a

counter-raid in support of Yeltsin's credibility?

Japan's crisis is, at heart, remarkably like Russia's.

The numbers look acceptable, so that sober

economists are still forecasting an economic

upturn before the end of this year. The policies, if

they are carried out - always a very big "if" in

Japan - follow all the most respectable advice. The

US Treasury demands a big fiscal stimulus. This is

just what is proposed - if you believe the official

numbers.

The IMF demands financial deregulation. It is

desperately needed, for until the credit market is

truly opened, the Japanese small companies

sector, the only potentially dynamic part of the

economy, will remain throttled for want of

expansion money and even working capital. As

with reflation, the plans are in place, even if they

do stick in the throats of those LDP factions with

strong banking links.

But even if the Japanese Government does, in

desperation, bite the bullet, the central problem

remains - the people. A discredited regime may

sound all the right bugle calls, but the citizens are

no longer listening. They have seen job security

vanish, pay is being cut and they now find their

pensions in question. Meanwhile, high street prices

are falling. For the citizen, everything points to the

same conclusion: spend less, save more against the

coming storm. So the fiscal stimulus will largely

vanish into savings accounts; and since the

domestic financial market offers miserable returns,

much will be invested overseas. Result: continued

slump, a huge current surplus, yet an ever-weaker

yen. As in Russia, speculators might lighten the

financial gloom: at some stage bargain-hunters will

revive the yen and the Nikkei. But the core

problem, an ageing and disillusioned population,

will remain.

Only a fool, then, would simply hope that Russia's

problems, or Japan's, will simply blow over. The

real question is how much they matter to the rest

of us; and here a little hope does make sense.

Neither of these largely closed economies is an

important source of demand for the rest of the

world: only of supply - oil and gas from Russia,

finance capital from Japan. China and the

wounded "tigers" of South-East Asia are much

more significant, especially on a forward view, and

their prospects do not look so black.

The most immediate threat is that the weak yen

will undermine all Asian currencies, even though

most are already too low for comfort. The

sophisticated defence mounted in Hong Kong

offers some reassurance. It was timed to punish

speculators sharply. The core Asian problem

remains, of course: the regional collapse of real

investment - a natural correction of the excesses of

the earlier Nineties (excesses which are also

destroying jobs in the UK).

With subsistence threatened by devastating

weather, it might seem that their situation could

hardly be worse. That, though, could be the silver

lining; for Asia's troubles are well understood in

the markets and, unlike Japan, they have not

resisted market adjustments. Little scope is left,

then, for nasty surprises, so their financial crisis is

probably past its worst.

It is the capital markets of the West that may still

be in a fool's paradise. Despite the correction

already achieved this year, prices still seem to

allow too little for the squeeze on profits, which is

bound to result from a world growth recession, to

use the mildest realistic term.

On the contrary, the sharp reaction to nearly every

profit warning shows all too much scope for

downside shocks. Those who believe that markets

put a rational price on the future ought to be

thoroughly alarmed.

Why, though, are prices so seemingly blind? The

real question is what has driven the world bull

market. This is partly a question of demography -

the trend in all Western countries to look to the

markets for old-age provision, a trend which has

only now set in across euroland. And it is partly

the recession itself. Companies which are reluctant

to spend on real investment feed their funds back

into the market through share buy-ins and

takeover bids. Equities are supported not so much

by dreams of ever-rising profits as by well-justified

bid speculation.

World recession is also inspiring a worldwide flight

into quality. Internationally, that means dollars first

and foremost. Within markets, it means bonds.

The advance of gilts and US Treasuries has been

so stealthy that there has been surprisingly little

comment on it; yet anyone who switched into

bonds at last year's equity peaks has enjoyed

another record investment year, despite all the talk

of 1929. To be sure, there are limits - Japanese

bonds, especially, look wildly overpriced, but real

yields in the English-speaking markets are still

quite sensible.

The chances still look good that in the West the

bull market still has a little life in it; and that it will

end, when it does, not with a clap of thunder but a

slow, expiring sigh.

-Copyright 1998 Times Newspapers Ltd.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list