No, sorry, we won't, he's just too appealing a target.
A decade is a long time. Why is that today he gives the impression -- along with Rubin, Camdessus, Fischer, etc -- of working essentially to keep the deregulated financial world from undergoing any structural change or serious work-out. Why is that he still keeps dumping loads of toxic financial waste on the rest of us? Is the economic logic that impeccable?
Patrick