i actually think curtis was pretty on the mark with his 'boring' (for jks) question.
JKSCHW at aol.com wrote:
> you hace to rember I am alsoa student of Rorty's
explain to me the fascination with rorty - never could see it myself. looks to me like rhetorical anti-foundationalism in the service of the great conversation between the greats... or am i thinking of someone else? care to elaborate?