Nuts - debt, future surpluses and compelled labour

rc&am rcollins at netlink.com.au
Tue Dec 15 00:20:25 PST 1998


i'd not been paying much attention to nuts and berries before, but the post by rakesh sparked my interest. i'll remain agnostic over the ratio of unproductive to productive labour, since i'm not sure whether or not certain tasks previously associated with unproductive labour can so easily be said today to be in the same realm. an example would be domestic work, where the difference is not in the task but whether or not a domestic worker produces surplus value. rakesh's comments were useful, but i don't know how much various quantitative assessments have taken this on in their initial formulations.

but, that wasn't what i wanted to ask.

Rakesh Bhandari wrote:


> Of course as private capital formation stagnates, the state must issue
> debt to finance a compensatory level of economic activity. But since such
> activity is also unproductive and does not itself produce any new value
> or surplus value, it can only be paid off by the state's future claims on
> social surplus value. High levels of state spending may increase the
> level of economic activity in the present while compounding crisis in
> the long run. In the 70s it took the form of runaway inflation.

okay. an hypothesis: to the extent to which the state now avoids the inflationary premises of keynsian spending, what are the measures being introduced which would enable the state to 'guarantee' a future surplus without resorting to inflationary measures? i think the 'answer' to this might explain the shift to things like workfare/work-for-the-dole, prison labour, slave-like forms of work, and - as doug has shown - the attempt to use the courts and the state to impose imf-like obligations on those in debt which compels them to future work. {as an aside, i think the proposed amendment to the US constitution to give the state the power to conscript labour should also be viewed in this light} what do you think rakesh? others?

also, maybe more interestingly, if the keynsian 'solution' to overproduction (well, maybe war) advanced inflation, then what are the 'spin-offs' from these new kinds of compulsion/forms of work? what problems does it pose for accumulation?

angela



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list