chuck miller
Doug Henwood wrote:
> Michael Eisenscher wrote:
>
> >By comparison, in 1995, the Computer Manufacturing industry employed about
> >498,000, of whom only 2.1% were union members. Adding other
> >electronics/information technology mfg. sectors (office equipment,
> >communications, and instruments...but not aerospace), there were about 1.1
> >million workers of whom about 6% overall were union members. In the Silicon
> >Valley, there is not a single semiconductor or computer manufacturing
> >facility that is organized.
> >
> >Despite much talk about organizing, as of this writing I am aware of not one
> >union (or the AFL-CIO) which has committed resources and staff to a
> >long-term sustained organizing effort in this **basic** industry. Can a
> >labor movement looking to its future afford to allow so strategically
> >important a sector to remain unorganized without putting that future into
> >doubt?
>
> I was in Eugene, Oregon, a couple of summers ago, visiting friends, at a
> time when Hyundai was proposing to build a chip plant against strong local
> opposition. (Those Oregonians love their computers, but no chip plants
> there, please!) An article in the local paper, the Register-Guard, quoted
> Oregon state economic development literature bragging that wages in the
> Oregon electronics industry, around $5/hr, were lower than Singapore's. It
> made me proud to be an American!
>
> Doug
-- http://www.users.uswest.net/~bautiste/index.htm