Brett
At 03:42 PM 7/29/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Max Sawicky wrote:
>
>>It remains for us to explain why we'll get
>>to 2.5, and why the arguments that we won't
>>get there are wrong.
>
>Seems to me the burden of proof is on someone forecasting a sharp departure
>from historical averages, not on those who argue that the future should be
>much like the past. (Don't tell Paul Davidson!) Even 2.5% is well below the
>average growth rate of the last 75 years.
>
>Doug
>
>
>
>
>