The ruling class argument that 'post-industrial' economy (or whatever) needs 'more + more educated workforce,' what with computers and other tech fetishes, is merely an ideology. This is an argument that is designed to blame the unemployed/underemployed/low-wage workers for their alleged 'education' deficit. This ideology also serves to make workers accept that they--not employers--are responsible for job training.
And if more college grads get actually produced, it will merely contribute to the credential inflation, where the positions that used to require, say, only high school diplomas would demand bachelor's degrees.
Also, if universities are in fact expanding in Florida, it's probably because with more college grads in the labor market, capitalists think that they can depress the wages/salaries of the middle strata and/or 'improve' the attitude of future employees.
Also, with less and less state funding, colleges + universities are retooling themselves to become the Edu Serv, Inc. where students will be treated as consumers of education services. Pretty soon 'student evaluation' might be renamed 'customer satisfaction survey,' which would ask questions such as: "Did your instructor treat you with courtesy?"; "Was the service prompt and efficient?"; "How do you rate the production value of classroom experience?"; and so on. College presidents will be called CEOs. Tenure? A thing of the soon-to-be past.
I don't see any 'skills shortage' in the USA. Besides, there is an overabundance of highly educated people all over the world, especially in the formerly 'socialist' countries and Asia. The US ruling class can always import them or subcontract work abroad (if it's tech work).
Yoshie