> Well, we know now that this news on 226 was premature. A month ago it
> looked like a sure win, but the unions really flexed their muscle and
> stopped it, by a 53/47 margin. (There's an LA Times story at
> <http://latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/POLITICS/ELECT98/ap_prop226.htm>.) Imagine
This is good. Now, of course, the unions will be free to continue contributing to "New Democrats" and other socially conservative, pro-death, anti-abortion, fiscally conservative candidates. --jks