> > Or that embarrassing half-assed
> > presidential campaign in 1996 (which might be partly explained by Ralph's
> > reluctance to file financial disclosure forms that would reveal that he
> > *is* supported by trial lawyers after all).
>
> Obviously you think taht being supported by the trial lawyers would be a
> very bad thing. Go ahead, support support deform, see if I care. The
> campaign wasn't much, but maybe Ralph thought that a symbolic campaign
> runa gainst the idae of money in politics ought to be low budget.
How much monet does it cost to answer the question: "Do you support the Defense of Marriage Act?" My complaint wasn't that he didn't run a slick, profesional campaign, it was that he wouldn't state his position on any other issues than the ones in his manifesto. Pathetic.
--
Joseph Noonan jfn1 at msc.com