you said: Oh c'mon. I'm not sure exactly what you mean here - the "called upon...as a way to" doesn't parse - but if you think I was demeaning your contributions, you're wrong. I wasn't.
reply:
I don't know why you didn't think the positions various people who would weren't already implicit on other threads. But I do know that you proposed using the black church as a matter of "fun" for the discussion list. In fact, what I'm really not sure of is what it means that you, or anyone, would propose that the black church is an autonomous discussion topic at all, as though the issues around the black church are different from the issues around "the church" or "race" in general. That's what I was responding to.
Kenny -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 3367 bytes Desc: not available URL: <../attachments/19980611/ff21edf6/attachment.bin>