populism vs. Marxism (was RE: Frank Sinatra)

Max B. Sawicky maxsaw at cpcug.org
Fri May 15 14:10:28 PDT 1998



> ...
> Right, history is written by the victors. You are pointing to a real
> problem, the disjuncture between theory and practice that has
> characterized
> broadly-defined Marxism. My practice involves trying to end this
> disjuncture (which means among other things that if the theory is
> wrong, it
> should be rejected).

That's cool. My point is that theories of political action ought to reckon with history, with how the working class actually struggles, not only how we would like it to. If one sees a compelling pattern in how insurgency actually has happened in the past, that is grounds for revising one's projects for the future. As you can tell, I'm into heavy revision.


>
> I have no brief for the CP, but most of the time, the IS folks
> were putting
> their theory into practice. The rank-and-file organizing that was so

What theory? Near as I can tell, their approach is to be good, militant trade unionists and to eschew parliamentary politics and existing Democratic or social-democratic politics. How that becomes socialism is beyond me. Maybe there is a theory underneath somether. God bless 'em. Nothing wrong with trade unionism, or being anti-bureaucratic. As for colonization, if you think the working class is going to mobilize, that's a reasonable thing to do, though it requires a thoughtful decision on the part of the erstwhile colonizer as to what they want out of life.

MBS



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list