Clinton the Smiling Enemy (was Re: Alterman and Rorty)

Yoshie Furuhashi furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Tue May 26 15:17:31 PDT 1998


Carrol Cox replies to Nathan Newman:
>(1) "To dismiss reform automatically (especially when we are in a period
>when reforms are being destroyed in favor or much worse in many cases)
>..." This assumption is itself an Alterman trick of more or less
>deliberately caricaturing the opposition. It should be fairly clear from
>both Yoshie's and my posts that what we are talking about is *precisely*
>the battle for reforms, and mor specifically yet, the battle against the
>reactionary reforms of the Clinton Administration. (He won nomination by
>ordering the execution of a brain-damaged prisoner; he won plaudits for
>destroying welfare -- i.e., carrying out his campaign pledge -- from a
>member of the DNC in a WSJ ed page column.
>
>That is, Clinton is the leader of the anti-reform forces in the U.S., and
>he is also the leader of the forces trying to reform progressive
>legislation from the past out of existence. Clinton is not a weak and/or
>wobbling friend of workers: he is the political leader of the Enemy. To
>defend Clinton is not an allowable option for anyone who cares to be
>considered a positive reformist.
>
>(2) "Folks like Rorty want to emphasize that the Left cannot win without a
>majoritarian view . . ." Again, the issue is achieving the necessary
>reforms (or preventing further reactionary reforms of social security,
>medicaid, medicare, etc. As has usually been the case the task the
>leadership of the Democratic Party (and such Clinton lackeys as Katrina
>vanden Heuvel and Rorty) is to foreclose the possibility of mass struggle.
>(The ersatz Clinton healthcare campaign very effectively blocked off for
>the time being any mass mobilization for the only reform that will make a
>difference, some version of free medical care for the bulk of the
>population.)
<snip>
>Everything we know supports Alexander Cockburn's prediction that the aim
>of the Clinton administration in its final years would be the destruction
>of Social Security.

Can't agree more!

And you know what? One of the first things that Clinton did during his first term was to bomb Bhagdad! Do the 'leftists' on this list remember that? I'm sure it made Rorty's cold-war liberal heart beat faster! Three cheers for 'national pride'!

Yoshie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list