As someone who is not particularly fond of sectarian harangues but who does repost articles I believe might be of some interest, I'd like to question your judgment on this one. While the article does conclude with a fairly standard (and boring) bit of dogmatic editorializing, the article provided some insight into Gates's history I had not seen published elsewhere. While it's your judgment call, and I respect your desire to keep the list from sinking into a pit of sectarian dogmatic harangues, I'd also suggest that you review your own standards for what is acceptable here. (In the interest of full disclosure, I acknowledge that I reposted this particular article to several lists, including my own distribution list. And those who know me know that I am not now nor have I ever been a particular fan of either Workers World or Troskyism.)
In solidarity, Michael E.
At 09:29 AM 5/28/98 -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
><JAZZ at wwpublish.com> wrote:
>
>>-------------------------
>>Via Workers World News Service
>>Reprinted from the June 4, 1998
>>issue of Workers World newspaper
>>-------------------------
>>
>>FROM RICHES TO RICHES: BILL GATES & THE MICROSOFT MONOPOLY
>>
>>By Gary Wilson
>
>[etc.]
>
>
>My apologies to all for this. Broadcasts from sectarian newspapers aren't
>welcome here.
>
>Doug
>
>
>