Othello, etc. (was Re: Invention of the white race)

Katha Pollitt kpollitt at thenation.com
Thu May 28 22:16:19 PDT 1998


I agree with Carroll about Othello. Desdemona's father is upset that he is a Moor, but gets nowhere with the council. Iago and Rodrigo mock his dark skin, but they're the villains. In the social world Shakespeare depicts, Othello is one of the most respected and effective men in Venice. He's an outsider, but No one says he is stupid, lazy, undeserving of command, disloyal, liable to rape or lacking in self-control, biologically subhuman etc. No one questions his authority. It's true he kills his wife , but Shakespeare's plays are full of men who are insanely jealous (Leontes) or who kill with not enough forethought (Hamlet, Romeo). And after he kills Desdemona, the fury of the envoy is turned not on Othello, but on Iago, who set the whole thing in motion. Shakespeare permits othello a noble suicide, while Iago is taken off to be tortured.

It's also far from clear that othello is supposed to be a black African, as opposed to an Arab ( he speaks scornfully of a turk as an "uncircumsized dog," which would only be an insult if he were Muslim, i.e. circumsized himself; also, his mother seems to be some sort of Egyptian?). The Elizabethans knew perfectly well that the Arabs had a great, if unchristian, civilization, with a material culture equal to their own. Medieval and Renaissance romances, after all, are full of noble paynims, love affairs between Christians and Muslims, etc. It really doesn't seem to me much like the discourse of black and white in nineteenth century America.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list