My question was roughly, if you get into the business of advocating the delegalization of speech you hold to be untrue, doesn't that get you on a slippery slope where anti- capitalist speech could be held to be similarly inappropriate?
And you answered, we need more anti-capitalist speech, it has already been made "illegitimate," and pro-capitalist speech would be outlawed under 'scientific' criteria.
Which I suppose answers the question.
MBS