Cockburn on slavery

Charles Brown CharlesB at CNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us
Thu Nov 12 06:35:02 PST 1998


Actually I was involved in a couple of extended discussions on this issue on another list a while ago. I agree with your suggestion that U.S. slavery _was_ capitalism. It was sort of a mixed system, such that the slave owners were capitalists and made profits on the world capitalist market, although they didn't pay wages. (This superexploitation was the basis for the U,S. slavocracy becoming the ruling class in the U.S. in the period before the Civil War; Herbert Aptheker has termed the Civil War a counterrevolutionary attempted coup d'etat by the overthrown slaveowning ruling class)

The capitalist system of the time included the U.S. slavery. Marx analyzes slavery as part of the socalled primitive accumulation of capitalism.

The whole world capitalist system of the period could not have had this structure, for the reason in my post you quote - capitalists need the spending of the wage workers to realize their profits out of the surplus value they exploit. So my point in the post was that there was a fundamental contradiction between slave capitalism and free capitalism, in that slave capitalism had the above contradiction in it.

By the way, this is an example of dialectics, because first slavery as part of the socalled primitive accumulation of world capitalism was a necessary element of capitalism. But then this form which was necessary at first came into necessary contradicton with "pure" capitalism with "free" labor. Thus, an internal contradiction in capitalism caused the historical change which was the Civil War and other abolitions of capitalist slavery. See "Hegel on Logical and Dialectical Contradictions" by James Lawler ( in Dialectical Contradictions : Contemporary Marxist Discussions:Marxist Educational Press 1982) on the paradoxical character of dialectical contradictions.

By the way, don't you think the slave masters may have forced some slaves to produce food and other subsistence goods not only for the slaves,but for the master and family ? You know that slaves provided much of the child and house care subsistence work for the master and family.

Charles Brown

Detroit


>>> Tom Waters <twaters at usit.net> 11/10 8:08 PM >>>

On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, Charles Brown wrote:


> I think one of the main problems
> for slavery in capitalism is that
> slaves are not paid, so they don't
> have any money to buy the
> commodities produced in a
> capitalist system.

Still, plantation slaves subsisted largely on commodities--meal and salt pork bought on the market, albeit by the planter. This has always struck me as a point in favor of those who would argue that new world slavery was a disguised form of capitalism.

Tom

Thomas Waters twaters at usit.net 1021 East Oak Hill Avenue, Knoxville TN 37917 But this wall is not real. How can it be real? It's only made of concrete and barbed wire.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list