Review of Sokal & Bricmonts' _FASHIONABLE NONSENSE_ ...

[Max Sawicky]

> . . . 
> First, they do not claim that they do not understand the argument that
> the pomo theorist is making *with the misappropriated scientific
> theories*, just that they are not experts in the writings of the
> authors in question.
> 
> Second, their undertaking is perfectly respectable.  Imagine if some
> nutcase were to take Max Sawicky's writings about profit rates and
> earnings, . . . 

Help!  I've slipped through a worm-hole into
the POMO quadrant . . .

mbs