Taking nothing away from Marta, it's ironic that it would take a case of discrimination against a particular type of foetus to cause us (some of us, at any rate) to question the "right to choose," but in the event of no such bias, there is no issue except from the standpoint of the unblemished foetus. In effect, by assuming away any defects or knowledge of any defects, the foetus is rendered less worthy of consideration, a reverse discrimination.
>From this standpoing, the 'seamless web' of Catholic
logic is more compelling than the secular right to
choose.
MBS