Can I say that there is something really weird about claiming that person x's condemnation of genocide y lacks "integrity" because person x did not sufficiently condemn genocide z?
Genocide is a bad thing, no matter who it is done by, no matter where, no matter when. Condemnations of acts of genocide are always welcome. They never lack "integrity."
Those who condemn the Nazi slaughter of Jews do not lack "integrity" if they have not sufficiently condemned the slaughter of the Australian aborigines. Those who condemn Israeli policy in the occupied territories of the West Bank and Gaza lack "integrity" because they have spent insufficient time condemning the failure of the PLO to remove those clauses of its charter calling for the abolition of Israel...
Brad DeLong