You are right. I apologize to any fans of Ehrenreich out there. It was uncalled for.
But I did find her _Nation_ piece terribly depressing to read--in large part because she *is* about as good as the left gets these days.
The underlying point seemsed to be that because we don't have the (feeble) social democracy that we had in the 1970s, we shouldn't try to defend (and expand) the new deal. That instead we should demonstrate against injustice, and refuse to support or defend the government as an engine of taxing and spending.
Now I think that new deal programs are still a pretty powerful engine of income redistribution. And I think that deciding that "the state" (which I understand to mean unemployment insurance, food stamps, TANF, and a progressive income tax) is no longer worth defending leaves open a lot of territory in which Hoover and Cato can wreak a lot of damage...
Brad DeLong