>I should have mentioned that the Wealth of Nations was little read
until
>after people realized that it might be useful in the wake of the French
>Revolution. Only a few libraries at Cambridge University even owned
the
>book before 1900.
>
I'm assuming that either a.) you mean 1800, or b.) it's late and I am misremembering when the French Revolution happened...
Jim Baird
______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com