I wrote in as scathing manner as I could, how could anyone care between
Boxer, and Fong. I will not vote for the "social democrat" Boxer. She does
not stand for working class rights. She went right along with and advocated
Clinton's murderous bombing campaigns against Iraq when it did not merit her
saying a word at the beginning of this year. She is a despicable war
mongering ass kissing anti-working class politician as usual. Let me be
clear I am no longer a democrat, and that a third party that represents
workers is all that counts as far as I am concerned. This is in response to
the Brad DeLong posting which came this morning.
>From: Brad De Long <delong at econ.Berkeley.EDU>
>Some time ago there was a question asked on this list: why should someone
>care whether California returned Barbara Boxer or Matthew Fong to the
>United States Senate next January? I would hope that recent news reports
>would have answered this question, and that everyone on this list would
>agree that we would prefer state power to be wielded by a social democrat
>like Barbara Boxer than by someone like Matthew Fong, who thinks that a
>good use of money is to give $50,000 to the Reverend Sheldon, who seeks to
>send those who perform abortions to the electric chair and to "quarantine"
>those infected with HIV.