Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 11:41:52 -0400 Reply-To: H-Net Labor History Discussion List <H-LABOR at H-NET.MSU.EDU> Sender: H-Net Labor History Discussion List <H-LABOR at H-NET.MSU.EDU> From: seth widgerson <sethw at maine.edu> Subject: Socialization of the Forces of Production To: H-LABOR at H-NET.MSU.EDU
Who can help Paul Adler with this interesting query? SW - - - - - - - - - - - -
For research I am doing on the history of work organization, I have been trying to track down the various uses of the marxist concept of "socialization of [the forces of] production." The corresponding entry in Tom Bottomore's "Dictionary of Marxist" thought was not particularly helpful, focusing only on the forms of collective property under socialism. Marx, of course, also saw the socialization of the forces of production as an important vector of development under capitalism. But what does socialization mean in that context? The standard interpretation focuses on (a) a growing interdependence of branches of industry in an increasingly complex pattern of social division of labor, and (b) a growing reliance of all branches of industry on a common stock of scientific [therefore somewhat public] knowledge. In standard marxist theory, capitalist relations of production are seen as an increasingly limiting constraint on these trends. Back in the 1970s and 80s, a French labor sociologist, Ph. Zarifian, made some interesting, creative use of the socialization concept to analyze organization-level changes in work organization. Have other scholars done much with the concept? My impression is that it has not received much attention, perhaps due to new-leftist disparagement of the causal role "Moscow-style" marxism attributed to the development of the forces of production in the overall dynamic of history... Any leads would be appreciated!
Paul Adler University of Southern California