<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
Rakesh Bhandari wrote:
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>For all his emphasis on competition, Brenner
slides into the neoclassical world here. The profitability of stronger
enterprises is boosted by the cheapend capital assets they pick up and the
higher rate of exploitation workers are willing to accept; the market
share they win then induces them to undertake the large scale investments
by which unit costs can be reduced and profitability restored (see
Mattick, Moseley, Carchedi). Which is to say that any renewed accumulation
begins with a more centralized capital on a WORLD scale and therefore
with a larger reserve army of labor on a WORLD scale.. Capital is not
capable of generating general prosperity on a WORLD scale even if it
overcomes the falling rate of profit; the system will generate
absolute misery on a WORLD scale at ever higher levels, no matter whether
the rate of profit or accumulation, be high or low. The system must be
destabilized and overthrown. But Brenner can't get himself to say that.
Too bad. That's why I read Mattick--he was one fearless, Marxian thinker.</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P><BR>This what I love you for, Rakesh.
<P>Mark
<BR> </HTML>