<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><TITLE>Adjudicating differences, was Sokol and Bricmonts</TITLE><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman">Doyle,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman">I don't believe I've ever been
angry with you for saying I was moralizing. I don't happen to think that
morality/ethical-political thought are 'bad' things. And to be told I'm
moralizing doesn't bother me because my critic is usually moralizing as
well. My critics, however, always seem to want to evade that retort from
me. So. Besides, if I were angry do you honestly think that I
would have spent hours and hours corresponding with you off list about things I
don't especially care a great deal about but that I thought I should at least
try to learn about just a wee bit? Doyle that would be silly and/or
perverse of me. Well, maybe I am perverse. Why I think I actually am
and I do like it that way. So.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman">Again, you seem to be
eager to avoid obsessive compulsive behavior, no? You seem to want
folks to understand how the brain "really" works so that we can
ground our principles and strategies for revolutionary social change in a much
more scientific and accurate understanding of the brain. As such we will
avoid o-c behavior which is the result of sectarian idealism which is the result
of attaching strong feelings to rules. In any event, any way you slice it
Doyle. You think that o-c behavior isn't a good state to be in, therefore
if you suggest that someone is o-c or exhibiting o-c like behaviors you are,
implicitly, suggesting that this is not a good thing. And thus, you've
deployed o-c in precisely the same way as Jim deployed blindness, irrationality,
etc.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">As for the rest of the post, I really don't
understand a word that you're saying despite all my exchanges with you.
All I know is this. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">1) Jim would like to be able to claim
that sightedness is preferable to blindness, to not be called on the carpet for
it, and to claim that this is an objective (intersubjective perhaps?) truth
which is to say that most people would agree given this historical
moment.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">2). You would prefer that Jim doesn't make
this claim because you disagree that sight is preferable to blindness, you gave
historical examples of when this wasn't so. And, you want him to refrain
from using metaphors of disability as the margin between normal and
deviant.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">If Jim thinks his claim is an objective truth
and you don't, then how is it possible to have both your views respected?
I believe that it is possible w/o recourse to ontological acrobatics and without
dissembling. I simply asked you what you thought. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Besides, Doyle, you should appreciate me much
more than you do: Who else gives you all these opportunities to
expound on Neuroscience, ey?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">SnitgrrRl </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">SnitgrrRl</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000
face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>