The Bourgeois Right to Bear Arms

[Carl Remick]

> >Also, as I've said before:  The right will always have more 
> and better arms.
> 
> That doesn't seem like very good reasoning, to me.  It
> sounds too much like 'burglars can always get into your
> house, so why bother locking the door?'  or 'we're all
> going to die anyway, so why not ignore dangers?'
> There's a serious false dichotomy at work there!

(Over quota)  I simply don't want the left to concoct excuses to justify
its own use of violence.  Whatever the initial moral worthiness of one's
aims, violence corrupts and absolute violence -- war -- corrupts
absolutely (Clinton and Blair:  Please copy).

Cqrl Remick