Marx in support of capitalist war

Michael Hoover hoov at freenet.tlh.fl.us
Sun Apr 25 10:03:14 PDT 1999



> On Sat, 24 Apr 1999 07:01:25 +0100 Chris Burford <cburford at gn.apc.org>
> writes:
> >Now it may be argued that Marx was supporting the bourgeoisie at a
> >time and in a situation of rising capitalism, in which the bourgeoisie was
> >progressive.
>
> Isn't that the point at issue here? The 1860s was still a time of
> rising capitalism. The North's victory during that war ensured the
> destruction of slavery in the South and the political triumph of
> industrial capital in US politics.
> Marx no doubt hade hopes that the rise of an
> American proletariat would ultimately strengthen the working class
> througout the world.
> Jim Farmelant

Marx wrote in the Introduction to _Capital_ that the US Civil War was as important to the working class as the American colonial war for independence had been for the bourgeois class...

In 1869, the 1st International General Council approved Marx's resolution calling for the National Labor Union in the US to oppose war with Europe...Marx's resolution reminded US workers that the International's congratulatory letter to Lincoln following his re-election asserted that the civil war would advance working class interests as the earlier war for independence had advanced bourgeois class interests..

Marx argues that the abolition of slavery signalled a new era in the working class movement, one characterized by growing working class independence in the US and growing international working class cooperation...he points out that the old parties and establishment politicians look askance at these developments and he indicates that they will to go to war to crush them...according to Marx, only years of peace would further working class interests, internecine war, on the other hand, would be in the general interests of the common oppressors of the working class...

Marx's resolution (written in English) also notes that an immediate effect of the US civil war was a huge national debt, the burden of which was imposed on working people by 'financial aristocrats' and similar 'vermin' (when questioned about the appropriateness of the word vermin, M replied that there was no other word to describe them)... Michael Hoover



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list