So land was a mixture of petty bourgeois private ownership and communistic state ownership.
The broad contention remains from the original post. That a social market in leasehold land, auctioned by the state, with social planning in the use of the land, would have permitted flexibility in industrial and commercial initiatives, would have generated income for the state, and most importantly in view of the disintegration of Yugoslavia, would have provided a mechanism whereby more economically active regions would have automatically contributed more to the federal assets for smoother federal economic planning.
Chris Burford