>ummm...open borders is not exactly adaption nor is it any form of indentured
>servitude. Why Doug thinks maintaining the INS at the border is progressive
>is beyond me.
You said admit Third World peasants to farm in South Dakota, which sounded a lot more restrictive than open borders. I'm no fan of the INS.
>The love of underpopulated farmland powered by cheap oil, eroding topsoil
>and poisonous pesticides is much more of an "adaption."
I never said that was the only conceivable model; I wanted to hear more about Michael's.
Doug