CB
>>> "William S. Lear" <rael at zopyra.com> 08/19/99 02:04PM >>>
On Thursday, August 19, 1999 at 13:00:33 (-0400) Carl Remick writes:
>>I thought it was subjunctive mood.
>
>Actually, I think it's in the imperative - Jack, be nimble (etc.)
You're obviously a reactionary imperative monger.
Jack be nimble. -> Jack, be he nimble. -> Jack, were he nimble.
Thus:
Jack, were he nimble. Jack, were he quick, Jack, were he all of these, he would jump over the candle-stick.
Or was it all a simple description of material reality:
Jack is nimble. Jack is quick. Jack jumps over the candle-stick.
And why is he jumping over a candle-stick, anyway?
Bill