LMD

Carl Remick carlremick at hotmail.com
Wed Dec 15 11:45:57 PST 1999



> Le Monde diplomatique
> -----------------------------------------------------
>LAW OF EMPIRE
>
>The US undermines international law
>
>by PHYLLIS BENNIS
>
> In the name of so-called "moral superiority" the United States
> wants to determine the norms of international life. But
> Washington's development aid to the poorest countries - $7bn in
> 1997 - is less than half what it was at the end of the cold war.
> Having failed to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) on
> 13 October, the US is forging ahead with anti-missile systems that
> put the disarmament treaties of the last decades at risk. By
> marginalising the UN and empowering Nato to intervene in
> Yugoslavia, it has violated international law and the UN Charter.
> And it is also refusing to sign or ratify other key documents such
> as the new International Criminal Court.

No, this piece has it all wrong – at least so says correspondent Adam Clymer of the NY Times, who has a piece in today’s paper on America’s relinquishment of the Panama Canal – an act, says Clymer, that highlights what a genial giant the good ol’ USA is these days. Excerpt:

“Out of a late 20th-century sense of sovereignty and respect for somebody else's national pride, a great power is in fact voluntarily giving a piece of valuable national property to a tiny nation with no capacity to seize it.

“With the end of the cold war, the venturesome role of presidents like the first Roosevelt or Lyndon Johnson seems to have given way, if not fully to the anti-colonial and anti-imperialist views of Woodrow Wilson, then at least to a sense of the importance of consultation and coalition before bombs are dropped. In Korea and Vietnam, the United States acted first, then looked for allies. In the Persian Gulf and Kosovo, it sought allies first.

“Even President Clinton's decision to stay away from the ceremony, though it caused disappointment and even criticism here, meant that the United States would not dominate the day. …

“On most international issues, from global warming to trade to poison gas or atomic bombs, the United States government seeks agreements among many or all nations. It often fails, and frequently does not convince its own people of the need for sacrifice some see in these agreements. But even when it acts unilaterally, as by raising tariffs on some French luxury foods, it follows procedures authorized internationally.”

Clearly, America’s a mensch among nations ;-)

Carl

______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list