Rich nations reneged on fund pledge UNFPA

Ulhas Joglekar ulhasj at bom4.vsnl.net.in
Thu Dec 16 18:09:09 PST 1999


15 December 1999 Rich nations reneged on fund pledge: UNFPA The Times of India News Service NEW DELHI: The rich developed countries have failed to keep the commitment made by them at the 1994 Cairo conference on population where they had pledged to contribute over $ 5 billion for reproductive health programmes. Disclosing this here at a press briefing on Tuesday Nafis Sadik, executive director, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) said the failure of donor countries to meet their contribution and the lack of resources was one of the most important issues which came up at the recent five-year review meeting of the Cairo conference held in New York recently. She said a total sum of $ 17 billion was required for carrying out the various reproductive health and related gender programmes of the UNFPA and of this the international community had committed $ 5.7 billion while the developing countries themselves were to raise $ 11.7 billion. ``A study commissioned by us found that developing countries met $ 8.9 billion out of their total share but donor agencies only contributed half of what they pledged'', she added. Sadik maintained the donor countries had accepted their lapse at the review meeting, adding that these countries were were preoccupied with developments in Eastern Europe and a lot of their funds were being diverted to countries like Kosovo and Bosnia. One of the donor countries, Germany, had intimated that it would be further reducing its contributions due to difficulties arising out of the merger with East Germany, she disclosed. However, she hoped that countries like Japan and the US, which has resumed funding for the UNFPA programmes, would be persuaded to step up their contributions. In this connection, she said, they were also tapping the private sector. She said some success in this regard had been achieved in the US withs everal foundations and private companies like Microsoft and Packard agreeing to contribute for population programes. However, she admitted, that companies wre a little wary of funding population programmes as they feared itw negative impact on their business. She said, when Bill Gates announced a huge package for such programmes, this announcement was met with demonstrations by pro-life groups. She said response like this tended to worry business houses. Asked about the negative reaction of political parties to the Bill banning those with more two children from contesting elections, Sadik maintained thethe main thrust of a population policy must be free, voluntary and informed choices in decisions regarding reproductive health including family size. She was not in favour of the two-child norm, stating this was the main plank of the Cairo conference as well which had specifically indicated that people should be able to exercise free and informed reproductive health choices. ``What we need is to step up programmes at the grassroots. Programmes dealing with basic issue like health, education and improved quality of services,'' she said, adding that it is these interventions which would would prove more effective in controlling population. It should also remove constraints that prevent people, especially women, from making these informed choices as well as address issues such as gender violence, HIV/AIDS and basic education for all, she said. The UNFPA chief, who is here on a short visit, has held a series of official meetings here including the health and family welfare ministry. Refering for the demand for increased funding from the Indian side, she said, given the resource constraint, she did not forsee any enhanced funding for the family welfare programme here. She also admitted that the Indian government had been a little slow in utilising the funds already earmarked by the UNFPA for these programmes but was confident the situation wouyld improve.

For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service
|Disclaimer|
For comments and feedback send Email Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. 1999.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list