I infer motive from the inattention given to the lives of the children in whose names such bans are imposed.
>
> [mbs] In the context of what I have written and published for all the world
> to see about deficits, this is hilarious.
Yes, everyone has seen it. And no one is listening to you. So losing the battle over deficits, why not throw in with aggressive nationalists?
> [mbs] If workers are fighting to keep the better-paying
> jobs that they still have, I support them. Some things
> really shouldn't require justification on a left list.
If China says future planes it buys should at least be produced with some local labor and some transfer of tech, why should US labor oppose this?
> Claiming that Keynesian policies are no longer feasible
> is exporting unemployment.
I am not to blame for the dear ears your calls for deficits have fallen on or why there has not been a real Keynesian in an important position for at least 20 years (according to James K Galbraith). Frustrated, you guys at the EPI are about to throw in with a Buchananish labor movement.
Yours, Rakesh