Well, we are talking on an e-mail list, not in the middle of an industrial action. BTW, the "Battle of Seattle" wasn't an industrial action either; it was a symbolic protest, street action in service of lobbying, it seems to me, from top labor officials' point of view. It would be interesting if organized labor decided to wage the anti-WTO campaign through industrial actions, better yet, internationally coordinated industrial actions. (As of now, longshoremen on the West Coast might be the only union willing to do something like that.)
>People are antsy about labor action because it entails
>at least temporary denial interests of other workers.
I for one think people (including you) are over-excieted, whatever their respective positions are.
>IT ALWAYS HAS. So counter-posed to concrete actions
>(shut down WTO), we are told workers should invoke
>their universal, internationalist rights. But where?
>How? Once again, it's a distraction, in terms of
>the concrete inaction it implies.
What will be the next political "action" of organized labor? Top officials lobbying hard while some workers calling up & e-mailing their senators and representatives? That will "neither nix nor fix" the WTO.
Yoshie