-----Original Message----- From: C. G. Estabrook <galliher at alexia.lis.uiuc.edu>
>Actually, I don't think Chomsky did make such a distinction in regard
to
>Faurisson. He simply defended the right to free speech -- that
speech
>should not be suppressed by law on the basis of its content, however
>erroneous or vicious it might be.
isn't this claim that speech should not be suppressed on the basis of its content a claim resting on making a distinction between the form of speech and its content? which is what I was saying.
angela