rc-am wrote:
> This
> >was Adam Smith's assumption. Under the tender exterior of Odysseus
> >beat the capitalist heart of gold.
>
> which raises the question of whether or not marxism is a teleology, or
> better: whether or not marxism is possible without being a
> teleological.
How so? The "which" is unintelligible. The replacement of even minimally developed discourse with two-line zingers becomes tedious.
Carrol