>Oh, and BTW, "Buffy" has just jumped a quantum level or two in the past
>2 weeks, as slayer #2 (it's a long story), Faith, accidentaly kills a
>human and sends the whole show into much darker terrain than ever
>before.
>
>Just one teeny tidbit: Buffy confronts Faith as being in denial about
>what she's done, and Faith counters that Buffy's the one in denial, who
>needs Faith to act out what she's afraid to. Buffy doesn't respond
>verbally at all, instead her body language shows how torn she is by what
>Faith says.
>
>This is nothing new, folks. When McCarthyism almost totally shut down
>substantive political discourse, there was a veritable explosion in pop
>culture--some of it due to blacklisted writers under psuedonyms, to be
>sure, but certainly not all.
>
>I wouldn't exactly compare "Buffy" to "The Twilight Zone", but then,
>Sterling never did succede with anything that took a lot of time and
>careful crafting, as a series does. Both shows have a surface
>appearance that belies their seriousness, just as the politics of the
>world around them had a surface appearance that belied their absurdity
>and tragic silliness.
>
>(Snitchens DEFINITELY included.)
>
>--
>Paul Rosenberg
>Reason and Democracy
>rad at gte.net
>
>"Let's put the information BACK into the information age!"