there's no such thing as positivism

[Jim heartfield]

In message <3.0.2.32.19990103084312.00fc10f4 at pop.gn.apc.org>, Chris
Burford <cburford at gn.apc.org> writes
>Going back to Jim H's original post, I do not doubt that logical
>positivists were intelligent enough to allow verbally for the limits of
>observable reality, but the philosophical enemy is surely better defined as
>empricism.

What's wrong with empiricism?
-- 
Jim heartfield