On the other hand, the point of the post is not her self-promotion but the documentation of the words and mealymouthed excuses of the racist Right leadership. A liberal probably couldn't have elicited such cold documentation.
--Nathan
-----Original Message----- From: pms <laflame at mindspring.com> To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Date: Monday, February 01, 1999 12:45 AM Subject: Re: Racists in the GOP
IMHO this article by huffington serves the same purpose as her new hairdo. It makes her a more valuble commodity on the pundit circuit. Not for one moment do I believe that her anti-racism is the genuine article, but only makes her a more effective and dangerous advocate of ideas that are bad for people of all colors, unless they're in a very high income bracket.(course I think rich people would be better off in a more just world, but that's a hard sell).
Has anyone else watched her performances on those panel discussions? You know, in this corner, William Buckley and Arianna the Huff. And the challengers....Ira Glasser and......
They really get to flesh out their ideas in that venue.
Not buying it-p
At 11:40 PM 1/31/99 EST, you wrote:
>In a message dated 99-01-31 23:08:30 EST, arianna huffington writes in
part:
>
><< Then came my telephone conversation with Gov. Fordice. ``I would
probably
>go
> again [to the CCC events],'' he told me. ``They are very delightful people
>and just because of a
> few views they hold, that wouldn't keep me from attending their events
> again.'' I asked him specifically about their views on Martin Luther King.
> ``He's not a hero of mine. He spent too much time in Soviet Russia for my
> liking,'' he replied.
> >>
>
>I think this is an important article-- bravo ms. huffington. If I could
get
>on the phone with Gov. Fordice, I would ask him if he felt Richard Nixon
had
>spent too much time in the People's Republic of China? inquiring minds
want
>to know. maggie coleman mscoleman at aol.com
>