The doctrine of 'information exceptionalism' is indeed to be treated warily. But that's not because it's *all* crap. Sure, much of it since Daniel Bell's day has been deployed to marginalise Marxian critiques.
But.
Information is demonstrably unlike other commodities - in terms of implications for degrees of exploitation, market power, internal cleavages in the working class, uneven development, cultural imperialism, difficulties to do with externalities/artificial scarcity, distortions of investment to do with difficulties in stock valuations, and generally further blurring the liberal distinction between the public and the private, and blurring some leftish ('workerist') distinctions between 'real' work and white-collar wankers. I hold 'information economy' means enough to warrant some investigation, anyway.
BTW, anyone got any tips for me on that telecommunications costs/prices query (he almost begged in desperation)?
Cheers, Rob.