DeLong Compares Mao to Hitler

Henry C.K. Liu hliu at mindspring.com
Thu Jun 3 05:28:54 PDT 1999


200 million "newly poor" created by neo-liberal globalization. Lets see if DeLong and Sawacky can find humor in that. DeLong was part of the Administration whose policy casued this to happen. He can't blame this one on Mao Zedong.

Henry C.K. Liu

Thursday June 3 1999

World Bank

estimates 200 million

'newly poor'

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Updated at 6.10pm:

In its first detailed look at the impact of the

Asian financial crisis on global poverty, the

World Bank estimates the world has 200

million ''newly poor'' and recommends urgent

changes in financial rescue programmes to

protect people, not just economies.

''Countries that until recently believed they

were turning the tide in the fight against

poverty are witnessing its reemergence,'' said

bank President James D. Wolfensohn. ''We

must now draw on the lessons of recent

experience to help us reshape our strategies

for the future.''

Programmes to avoid and deal with financial

crises in all countries must now boost social

protections, often called ''safety nets,'' the

bank said. They include unemployment

insurance, subsidised school fees, job

creation, food subsides and other programs

directly affecting the poor.

The bank is responding to data showing

poverty rising again in India, continuing to go

up in Africa and sharply worsening across

eastern Europe and central Asia. Indonesia,

hit early in the crisis, is among the worst off,

with 30 million more people earning less than

HK$8 a day than it had before the financial

collapse.

Worldwide, the number of people below that

income, considered the benchmark for abject

poverty, is estimated at 1.5 billion - up 200

million from 1993. Final figures for 1999 will

not be available for several years, but the

estimate is based on trends since 1.2 billion

poor were counted in 1987.

Despite the gloomy outlook, the report said

there has been widespread progress in health

and education. And an exception to the

increase is China, where the number of poor

is believed to have declined from 280 million

in 1990 to 125 million in 1997.

The bank, in a report last week based on a

survey of Asian companies, concluded that

Asian economies are recovering more quickly

than expected from the Asian crisis. The new

report points to the lasting impact of the crisis

on some of the world's poorest, diminishing

hope of cutting worldwide poverty in half by

2020 - a goal many experts had thought could

be achieved.

''The East Asia crisis and its spillover into

other emerging markets offers the world an

opportunity to devise a new approach to

crisis, one that rightly puts concern for the

poor and the vulnerable right at the centre of

its response,'' said World Bank economist

Giovanna Prennushi, who wrote the report.

''By helping countries establish stronger social

protections, the international community may

be able to prevent the sudden

impoverishment of millions of people when

crisis strikes.''

The bank has distributed to world

policymakers a working paper that lays out

plans for safeguarding the needy before and

during financial crises. The paper gauges the

impact of recent developments on the poor in

East Asia, Latin America and Africa.

Wage cuts, job reductions, lower rates of

return on savings, reduced government

benefits and drops in services such as health

care and safety can all affect people directly

and immediately, the paper says,

recommending guidelines for programs that

head off such problems.

A ''pro-poor response'' to all crises could add

up to 5 per cent to governments costs, but

could be cheaper, in the long run, than hastily

prepared relief operations that have no lasting

impact, it says.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list