Peter Gowan Counterpunch article (excerpt)

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Thu Jun 10 20:31:25 PDT 1999


[I hope this is short enough to qualify under A. Cockburn's strictures. It's under 10% of the whole]

[This is from a section Gowan calls "The Theory of American `Stupidity'". I'm not sure I finally back this idea that nothing happened by accident. But I do know it makes a lot more sense than the preposterous theory that that we bombed because we knew that Milosevic was about to start an ethnic cleansing.]

Michael

Counterpunch online (www.counterpunch.org)

Peter Gowan

The Twilight of the European Project

<snip>

5. The Launch of the War and the Need for Stupidity. With the 'failure'

of Rambouillet, the Clinton Administration took open charge of the

preparations for war. And it is at this point that the analysis of

those who support the NATO Air War faces absolutely irreconcilable

contradictions. For the way in which the war was launched is, on the

face of it, absolutely inexplicable.

The bombing campaign was launched in 24th March. But President Clinton

announced on the 19th of March that the bombing campaign would be

launched and nothing now could block it. The US administration thus

gave the Serbian government 5 days in which they could do as their

pleased in Kosovo. And when the bombing started, it was organised so

that the Serbian authorities could continue to have a free hand in

Kosovo for more than a week. The air war's first phase was directed

largely at targets outside the Kosovo theatre itself for a full week.

And this military side of the attack was combined with an absolutely

contradictory set of explanations for NATO's aggression. On one side,

the attack was justified as an attempt to prevent the genocidal threat

to the Kosovar Albanians from the Milosevic regime. But on the other

side, the attack was simultaneously justified by the claim that the

Milosevic regime had no such genocidal intentions and indeed wanted

the bombing campaign in order to use it to sell Rambouillet to the

Serbian people.

These contradictions cannot be explained away by haste, improvisation

and confusion on the part of the Clinton administration. We know that

the US National Security Council and the State Department had been

planning this war in detail for 14 months before it started. We know

also from the Washington Post that the experts in the US

administration spent those 14 months running over, day after day, all

the variants of the course of such a war, all the scenarios of

possible Yugoslav government responses to the air attack. We know that

they foresaw the possibilities of mass refugee exits from Kosovo. The

Pentagon foresaw a long air war: the notion that Milosevic wanted the

bombing attack was political spin put about by General Wesley Clark:

it was nonsense. So why did they plan the start of the war in this

particular way?

There is only one serious explanation: the Clinton administration was

giving the Serbian authorities the opportunity to provide the NATO

attack with an ex post facto legitimation. The US was hoping that the

five days before the launch of the bombing and the first week of the

war would give various forces in Serbia the opportunity for atrocities

that could then be used to legitimate the air war.

This was a rational calculation on the part of the US planners. They

knew that the main political opponents in Serbia of Milosevic's

Socialist Party -- the Radical Party of Seselj and various Serbian

fascist groups -- supported the ethnic cleansing of Kosovo, though the

Socialist Party did not. They knew also that Yugoslav military forces

would pour into positions in Kosovo as the OSCE personnel left,

clearing strategic villages, driving forward against KLA-US

supporters. They could predict also that there would be a refugee flow

across the borders into Macedonia and Albania.

And the US planners were proved right. Extremist Serbian groups did,

it seems, go on the rampage in Pristina for three days after the start

of the war. Refugees did start to flood across the borders. And the

resulting news pictures did indeed swing European public opinion

behind the war. As for the Serbian government organising a genocidal

mass slaughter, this did not happen: the Clinton administration

organised the launch of the war to invited the Serbian authorities to

launch a genocide, but the Milosevic government declined the

invitation.

It is simply impossible to argue that the US military campaign was

designed to stop the brutalities against the Kosovo Albanians. It

would be far easier to demonstrate that this thoroughly planned and

prepared war was designed to increase the chances of such brutalities

being escalated to qualitatively higher levels. The way that the war

was launched was designed to increase the sufferings of the Kosovar

Albanians in order to justify an open-ended US bombing campaign

against the Serbian state. The technique worked. But this success

cannot be acknowledged. Instead it must be hidden by the notion of

Clinton administration stupidity.

<end excerpt>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list