>How about, dialectical and historical materialism ?
>
no problem chaz, but that's a method is it not? furthermore, that approach clearly doesn't stop the proliferation of sectarian disputes because the question isn't simply about method (though i surely don't mean to suggest that method is sep from theory and practice; they're not), but also about how to get from here to there based on an examination of "how we got here" and what's "what's going on now"
but more later lovelies, kelley
>CB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>