>Well, I know Castells has said exploitation is passe. Exclusion is the
>phobic phenomenon du juour for him. Does this not imply that the ensnaring
>of the unexploited into capital relations might now count as progressive?
Why's this an either/or thing? What's wrong with Joan Robinson's formulation, which I quote too often, that under capitalism the only thing worse than being exploited is not being exploited.
Doug