Someone interviewed for the article points out that abolishing the tax would further encourage maldistribution of income and wealth, but Flanigan argues that the current U.S. tax is too little to do the job of equalizing opportunity(that's a new one) and for that and other reasons (small business needs repeal) supports the repeal. He is a trickle down kind of guy, don't we all know that would spur more economic growth?? There are so many inanities in the piece, I can't go thro them all. . .
Does anyone remember if this was proposed by the 104th Congress in the Contract on America, or is this is a new one?
marta russell