NATO Bomb Kills Two Peacekeepers

Wojtek Sokolowski sokol at jhu.edu
Wed Jun 23 06:42:31 PDT 1999


At 04:44 PM 6/22/99 -0400, Charles Brown wrote:
>Starting about 500 years ago, the overgeneralized distinction between
whites and coloreds originated with Europeans, who referred to themselves as whites. Before the 1960's in the U.S. the overwhelming majority of whites of all classes used this generalization, quite freely and casually considering themselves superior to coloreds. The cohesiveness of the group "whites" came from this internal social , political and economic construction of self or identity. ---snip


>Henry's use of the generalization regarding whites frequently treating
people of color as lesser humans (racism) , e.g. sending into danger zones in war or in mines as human fuses is not at all casual , but every bit as valid as all kinds of other social and economic generalizations made on this list and elsewhere.

Not so fast, Charlie Brown. There were different shades of whiteness - Eastern Europeans, Jews, and Italians were hardly above the Blacks and on a par with Asians on the moral-intellectual hierarchy ladder (cf. Stephen Jay Gouls, _The Mismeasure of Man_). The "whites proper" were only of the anglo-saxon/nordic stock.

I am pretty sure that in those good ol'days you, Henry, and I wound end up in the same coal mine, regardless of different shades of our skin.

wojtek



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list