For some reason Bruno S submitted my words in a post about community building addressed primarily to Yoshie to subtext reading. I don't really know what this mishmash says, but it some kind of clouded filtering of what I originally wrote.
Bruno S. Hello Yoshie, I like being You And others. Just to be clear, I think maybe I am just predjudiced...the people I like do what I want... anyway I just want you to contribute to that direction.
I don't know a bunch of people, but I think of you as being like Kelley. I like her. I like Kelley. my course leaves me with the sense that you are someone who I (can set) right.
I like Chuck because he has a lot of experience with pictures of my favorite painters. I say various things about how I view my body. That is representing it.
pills to you Doyle
Doyle If you could write a little bit more clearly it might make sense to me. I don't care that much if you don't like what I had to say, and it appears that you are criticizing me for what I said. But I wonder too what is the point really. I want to build a community, meaning to form ties with people I think represent my views, and on a great scale take part in building a working class movement somehow. I don't connect with some people as much as I would like to, but I'm open to making bridges to anyone. I don't have any special answers to that, and I think the diversity of my relationships is important.
Someone else by the signature of Jeanne Sustette Gontard writes: At 01:18 PM 3/21/99 PST, Bruno S wrote:
At 01:18 PM 3/21/99 PST, Bruno S wrote:
Oh dear Mr. Strosek, I must give you a big wet kiss for this beautiful beautiful reading of Mr. Saylor.
I don't believe that I've ever laughed quite so hard in my entire life. My but you do have a gift for reading the Other.
I dedicate my next response to you and to Herzog and to Marvin Gaye, After the Dance
Cheers,
Jeanne
Doyle This person seems positively malevolent toward me. The indirectness of their anger gets in the way of any kind of attempt to write to me about communicable differences. I would invite someone who thinks I'm laughable to be more direct about what is the problem. More precisely what is the economic reality of the problem. The class nature and meaning of these things. Struggle with me. Especially I would like it to be clear what exactly you stand for yourselves. Are you Derrida influenced. Because I am not really a fan of Derrida. And so we have a very deep chasm between us. I can't tell what you represent.
Doyle Here are some additional quotes from Bruno S not directed at me, but meant to fill a little meaning to Bruno S thought.
"hey, "shoulder pads" is one of my fave FALL songs and that is definitely eighties.
bruno s
"i completely disagree with your take on the male gaze. males may be instructed to reun scared from the male nude but in this instruction the male nude is indeed fetishized for the male in much the same way that the female body (ideally) is fetishized. homophobia, queer theory, drive towards genderlessness...
and critique is impossible if we are to remain gendered on the Subject.
"why might we say this? do you desire this?
this rabid for of interpretation is a tool for social stratification: something to keep the masses busy...
derrida is useless.
and concepts are definable. you can say what you mean and be understood.
if what you write is true, then why do we use metaphor to define concepts as well as in everyday speech.
so, irony, then, is the postmodernist interpretation of everyday life
because you can't take the pomoistas seriously
shoot to kill
is this really me?
bruno
Doyle You know this sort of stuff is pretty remote from ordinary peoples lives. Sounds pretty abstract and irrelevent. regards, Doyle Saylor