Krugman sad

Henry C.K. Liu hliu at mindspring.com
Tue May 4 21:11:10 PDT 1999


Americans are not capable of understand or advising Japan, becasue they think its logical for the Japanese to help restore the collapsing American economic empire. The Japanese have a very different agenda which they never openly discuss with Americans because they do not like confrontations culturally and certainly not before the time is ripe. Japan sees the current financial/economic crisis, which for Japan has been building for more than a decade, as the gradual collapse of the post-war American world order and an opportunity for Japan to become an independent power again. Japan is prepared to suffer and can afford to suffer the pain in order to srike a better deal for itself in the coming new world order. They see all the advice and prescriptions coming their way from America as self-serving strategies that help America more than they help Japan. And Japanese officials will pay lip service to these advice and prescriptions and pretend they are trying their best to follow them. The few Japanese initiatives that Japan did propose had been categorically shot down by American officials (one in the WB/IMF meeting in Hong Kong in October, 1997, and the latest one in the G7 meeting in Bonn a few months ago.) The Japanese government has a strategy of absorbing from the general public the pain caused by the economic stagnation. For Japan, it can go on like this for another decade, if the starting point after the collapse will put Japan on a more even footing. They are living on their debt interest income from America. Americans think quarterly, Japan thinks in 50 year cycles. That is why Greenspan/Rubin don't trust them and resist Japanese leadership in Asian affairs. The US is opposed to Japanese leadership in ASEAN. Rubin turned down a US$100 billion rescue package for Asia in October 1997 during the World Bank/IMF meeting in Hong Kong. He also turned down a Japnese/EU proposal to stabilized the 3 currencies during the G7 meeting in Bonn in January, 1999.

Summers, whose credibility has been irrevocably tarnished internationally by his inept handling of the global financial crisis in the past two years, gave another admonishing speech in Japan on February 26, 1999, warning Japan not to depend on a weak yen to boost its economy, using worn-out slogans such as: "the exchange rate cannot be a substitute for policy."

Its an amazing posture after Rubin/Summers turned down a Japanese/EU joint proposal for a 3 currency stabilization regime at the G7 meeting in Bonn. Being a bit humbled by his own dismal record of first diagnosing the Asian crisis as merely transient, then IMF off-the-shelve conditionalities as the only cure, and finally non-intervention of free financial markets as a inviolable guiding principle, Summers declared vaguely this time the Krugman cure: "What I think is crucial is the recognition that the goal of price stabily include the responsibility to avoid deflation." He and Rubins declared only a month earlier that while free markets are not perfect, all other forms intervention alternatives are worse. He then went to Japan and again asked the Japanese to intervene in their economy with interventionist monetary policies. Yukihiko Ikeda, a senior member of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, reported told the press: "Mr. Summers says, do this, do that. But we will continue with steps already in the works." Japanese officials are generally of the opinion that reflationary policies would further weaken the yen, due to pressure on the value of the yen from any increased supply. It may lead to further currency devaluations in other parts of Asia. The BOJ, Japan's central bank, thinks Krugman/Summers are offering snake oil cures in the notion of fighting deflation with easing money supply. Meanwhile, the prime minister of Malaysia is publicly urging Japan to dump its US Treasry holding to show Asia's displeasure on US nationalistic globaliztion policies.

With Rubin/Greenspan successfully resisting stabilized global exchange rates, the effect of foreign governments printing money will not create inflation in the US. It only means the Thai baht and the Brazilian real will fall in value against the dollar. Hyperinflation will not help Japan. Krugman is wrong. Because both the debtors and creditors in Japan are Japanese and they both use yens. There will be no indirect debt forgiveness through inflation, only currency devaluation replacing asset deflation, At the end of the day, Japanese assets will end up being worth less. Deflation increases Japanese trade competitiveness without devaluing the yen. Reflation will not solve any problem for Japan. It only pushes the policy ballon from a direction that currently catches the fancy of Krugman/Smmers.

American globalization created bubbles all over the world that burst in 1997. The EU is on the way down. The American domestic bubble continues to expand from the "salutary" effect (Greenspan) of the global crises that started in Asia. Japan is waiting for the American bubble to burst from which to build a more equal footing for Japan in the new economic order. In the mean time, Japan has a good excuse not to buy from America while building up a handsome trade surplus. Rubin is right about one thing: America cannot be the sole engine for the whole world economy. It will have to overheat and blow a piston sooner or later. The Japanese know that all bubble burts, some only later.

Henry C.K. Liu

James Baird wrote:


> >
> > Dennis is correct. The Japanese are playing a different game to
> reposition
> > themselves for the long haul while playing dumb with American advice.
> None of
> > the countries that followed American/IMF prescriptons are doing that well.
> >
> > Henry C.K. Liu
>
> But is that what Krugman is recommending? He's spent the last six months
> saying that Japan needs a decent dose of inflation as a kick start - not
> exactly IMF orthodoxy.
>
> Jim Baird



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list